Thread:Desboy96/@comment-3462923-20120815203927/@comment-14250-20120902010539

I agree that breaking characters down into organizational subcategories is simply a minor edit, not complex at all. But I don't really see what makes it a ploppy mess.

These categories serve to organize the information further. It allows people to collectively view links to all articles sharing a common attribute. It becomes less organized by lacking them.

While the information is certainly present in the infobox (the category duplicates that at the bottom), the presence in the infobox doesn't provide the convenient alphabetical presentation of articles sharing that infobox trait like a category does.

Breaking them down further involved more work to me, but I don't understand why it required more work of you, as you created work through the choice to delete them. The greater good is organizational presentation of the data.

If you don't want to make pages, no pressure at all, I just think it would be good to allow others to build them, in that case, even if it has to start as an inferior stub until it gets improved up to par with the others. For every lacking page, a void of information exists.